![]() ![]() They're also not particularly cheap - could be at least as expensive as a lower end scanner, and maybe more. Services are fine, but you risk damage/loss of the negatives shipping them to and back from the scanner service. It's up to you to decide how much you feel it's worth the effort and time put in. That said, it takes time and a bit of practice/trial & error to get things down to where you can consistently generate good scans. Prints are fine if you have no other option, but the negs will give you superior scans. Skip the prints and scan the negs instead. Should I invest in a film scanner? If so, what would you recommend?Īlternately, should I use a service? What would you recommend? As a rough estimate I would say I have 2000-2500 exposures, some of which I will discard. ![]() I have the original 35 mm color negatives. Is this the best I can expect? If not, what are I doing wrong? Is there a particular setting I should be using? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |